IJHS
Interprofessional Journal of Health Sciences
formerly Bulletin of Health, Science and Technology (BHST)
https://ijhs.rsu.ac.th
ISSN (Print) 2672-9628
ISSN (Online) 2672-9423
Interprofessional Journal of Health Sciences. Vol.14 No.2 , July - December 2016.
WHAT A PHARMACIST/PRACTITIONER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT EVALUATING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES
Brianne Blakesley, Thanapat Songsak, Thitima Wattanavijitkul, Louis Lteif, Allen Shih, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit
Abstract
Trials/Studies of published systematic reviews/meta-analysis have shown little consistency and often poor quality in proper reporting, introducing potential errors and biases to the overall study results. As the pharmacy profession continues its quest for provider status to provide patient care services, it is pivotal for pharmacists to efficiently evaluate and interpret the quality of systematic reviews before applying the results to patient care. This review aims to educate pharmacists, practitioners, and students on how to evaluate systematic reviews in the context of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. An example is also provided to illustrate how to apply PRISMA in evaluating a published meta-analysis. As pharmacists become increasingly involved in medication optimization services within the patient care process, the ability to properly evaluate systematic reviews and the application of evidence-based medicine will be essential components in providing optimal patient care.
Keywords: systematic review, meta-analysis, evidence-based medicine